Posts Tagged ‘law suit’

Philadelphia News

April 14, 2008

Several Philadelphia criminal defense attorneys filed suit on April 10, 2008 in the Eastern District seeking “a fairer compensation system for court-appointed lawyers, and, thus, better representation for indigent defendants,” according to Julie Shaw at the Daily News.  The compensation system has not changed since approximately 1993 other than ”an increase a few years ago in the homicide preparation fee to $2,000 and in the felony preparation fee to $650.”

The law suit asserts thatthe current rates “sometimes result ‘in actual compensation of only $5 to $10 per hour’…[and as] a result, many experienced criminal-defense lawyers refuse to accept court appointments and are withdrawing from the list or have already withdrawn.”

The suit names the Court of Common Pleas, President Judge C. Darnell Jones II, Judge D. Webster Keogh, administrative judge of the Trial Division, Mayor Nutter, and the city solicitor’s office as defendants.

The complaint asks the court to prohibit all criminal trials involving court-appointed lawyers until a more adequate pay system is put in place.

In unrelated Philadelphia news, Versus TV network is relocating to Philadelphia.  This is the channel that broadcasts cycling,  including the Tour de France, as well as the NHL and the Professional Bull Riders.  If you are interested, you can check out open opportunities at Versus Jobs

Couple Sues Google Over Street Views

April 7, 2008

Law.com reports that a couple outside of Pittsburgh is suing Google for invading their privacy by snapping a photo of their house for Google Street View, a map feature that allows users to see pictures of streets.  They claim that Google caused them “mental suffering and diminished value of their property,” according to the complaint. They are seeking at least $25,000 in damages.

According to the article, unidentified lawyers reported that they do not “think suing Google over Street View photos will become a huge trend. Like any member of the public, Google is allowed to take pictures from public streets.”

The couple claim that “Google drove down Oakridge Lane — a private road owned by residents — and then further trespassed into their driveway to take a photo that includes their pool.”

Kevin Bankston, a lawyer with the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, noted that the couple in the case may have trouble proving damages.

A spokesman for Google said that the company has a policy of only taking photos from public streets and that concerned citizens can contact the company if they want a photo taken down.

No word on whether there is a plan to turn the case into a class action.

Link Dump

October 22, 2007

Lawyer bride sues her florist because she isn’t happy with what she got for $27,435.

18 year old may become youngest lawyer in California if she passes the bar. 

Firm adopts “no-jerks” policy.